Clearview AI has settled a biometric data privacy lawsuit introduced by the American Civil Liberties Union and different advocacy teams by agreeing to restrict the gross sales of its face biometrics app and using a part of its database.
The ACLU alleged that Clearview violated Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) when it constructed its database of reference templates from pictures discovered on the general public web, together with co-plaintiffs the Sex Workers Outreach Project Chicago, Mujeres Latinas en Acción and several other different teams.
Under the phrases of the settlement, Clearview has agreed to not license its biometrics to personal firms, personal people, or particular person authorities staff not approved to signify their state or federal company. The ACLU means that this additionally ends the follow of encouraging adoption with free trial license marketed on to particular person regulation enforcement officers, as a substitute of official channels.
The firm additionally dedicated to limiting entry to its forensic biometric app to regulation enforcement organizations in 2021.
“This settlement is a huge win for Clearview AI,” declares Jenner & Block Partner Lee Wolosky, representing the corporate, in an announcement offered to Biometric Update. “Clearview AI will make no changes to its current business model. It will continue to expand its business offerings in compliance with applicable law. And it will pay a small amount of money to cover advertising and fees, far less money than continued litigation would cost.”
Clearview will additional keep away from promoting to state and native police in Illinois for 5 years.
The settlement additionally stipulates that Clearview should delete biometric templates created earlier than it ceased offering entry to the database to personal people and entities, apart from assembly the situations of doc preservation related to the corporate’s remaining ongoing litigation. The templates will be created or recreated based mostly on BIPA exemptions or authorized compliance, nonetheless, and should have already got been.
“The settlement does not require any material change in the company’s business model or bar it from any conduct in which it engages at the present time,” Clearview consultant Floyd Abrams of Cahill Gordon mentioned in an announcement. “Clearview AI currently does not provide its services to law enforcement agencies in Illinois, even though it may lawfully do so. To avoid a protracted, costly and distracting legal dispute with the ACLU and others, Clearview AI has agreed to continue to not provide its services to law enforcement agencies in Illinois for a period of time.”
Clearview will function a publicly-available opt-out mechanism, and pay $50,000 to publicize it on-line. The firm has additionally agreed to cowl $250,000 in plaintiff’s authorized charges.
“By requiring Clearview to comply with Illinois’ pathbreaking biometric privacy law not just in the state, but across the country, this settlement demonstrates that strong privacy laws can provide real protections against abuse,” Nathan Freed Wessler, a deputy director of the ACLU Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, wrote in an announcement following the choice. “Clearview can no longer treat people’s unique biometric identifiers as an unrestricted source of profit. Other companies would be wise to take note, and other states should follow Illinois’ lead in enacting strong biometric privacy laws.”
The advocacy teams had been represented by Attorney Jay Edelson, a frequent BIPA litigant, amongst others.
“Clearview AI’s posture regarding sales to private entities remains unchanged. We would only sell to private entities in a manner that complies with BIPA. Our database is only provided to government agencies for the purpose of solving crimes,” feedback Clearview CEO Hoan Ton-That.
“We have let the courts find out about our intention to supply our bias-free facial recognition algorithm to different industrial prospects, with out the database, in a consent based mostly method.
“Today, facial recognition is used to unlock your phone, verify your identity, board an airplane, access a building, and even for payments,” Ton-That continues. “This settlement does not preclude Clearview AI selling its bias-free algorithm, without its database, to commercial entities on a consent basis, which is compliant with BIPA.”
Clearview remains to be defending itself in multi-district litigation over alleged violations of privacy legal guidelines.
ACLU | biometric data | biometrics | BIPA | Clearview AI | data safety | face biometrics | facial recognition | lawsuits | laws | privacy