Placeholder whereas article actions load
Elon Musk’s buy of Twitter is anticipated to go down in historical past as one of many largest hostile takeovers of all time.
But not like most company raiders, who deal with funds, Musk has mentioned he needs to strengthen the corporate’s place on “free speech,” that he needs it to succeed because the “de facto public town square” and to advertise world democracy. He’s even mentioned the economics don’t matter, and put up a good portion of his personal private wealth to finance the $44 billion deal.
Musk’s imaginative and prescient for Twitter — which he revealed even earlier than he was briefly the biggest investor within the firm — displays a brand new development threatening company boardrooms: a rising tendency by shareholders to demand reform from corporations, not simply higher monetary efficiency.
Through pure would possibly or grass-roots campaigns, generally in coordination with nonprofit teams, activists more and more try to steer company boards to scale back their impression on the atmosphere, assist the welfare of their communities and take different steps that may make good enterprise sense by burnishing company reputations and limiting regulation.
I hope that even my worst critics stay on Twitter, as a result of that’s what free speech means
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 25, 2022
Activists not too long ago pressured Amazon and Apple to undergo audits of their racial fairness insurance policies, for instance, whereas fossil gas giants have been compelled to start reckoning with their carbon footprint. Growing dissent amongst shareholders at drug distributor McKesson led the corporate to dock the pay of an government who presided over the opioid epidemic.
Even Carl Icahn, the legendary company raider identified for hostile takeovers of Trans World Airlines and Blockbuster, has not too long ago adopted the tactic — shopping for up shares and waging battles towards McDonald’s and grocery chain Kroger, each of which he says assist the inhumane therapy of pigs of their provide chains.
Icahn mentioned in an interview he thinks “it’s great” that Musk succeeded in his bid for Twitter, as a result of it reveals the board of administrators accepted the views of the corporate’s shareholders. He mentioned he hopes to see extra activist buyers achieve pushing boards and managers on issues past quarterly earnings.
“There really might be a move in that direction,” Icahn mentioned. “If you don’t have good leadership at the top, sooner or later you are going to pay a price for it.”
Brenden Lee, a spokesman for Twitter, declined to remark. Musk didn’t reply to a request for remark.
This activist strategy contrasts with the playbook of typical company raiders, who for many years have succeeded in shopping for out struggling corporations by presenting public plans for making radical price cuts, shedding enterprise strains or bringing in a brand new crew of financially savvy managers.
That technique continues to be widespread. Kohl’s is keeping off a number of activist corporations that argue the low cost retailer has mismanaged its enterprise and may put itself up or sale, and train gear maker Peloton earlier this yr compelled out its CEO and minimize 1000’s of workers after one investor, Blackwells Capital, argued to different shareholders and the board that the corporate’s technique was floundering.
“The activist is part of the environment in which every business has to work,” mentioned Brian Quinn, an affiliate professor at Boston College Law School. “They have to understand that the vast majority of their shareholders are passive but stockholders with the ability to target them can force changes.”
Musk in some ways continues to be following the old-school playbook, rejecting a board seat earlier than launching a hostile takeover bid two weeks in the past to construct on his stake within the firm. As the world’s richest individual, Musk had the assets to snap up one of the crucial influential social media websites virtually in a single day. And regardless of his frequent tweeting on the matter, he has not detailed any plans to curb what he views as censorship on Twitter.
Based on a few of his some public statements, civil liberties consultants raised issues that his possession may truly hurt the power of some customers to freely share their concepts.
One issue enabling the rise of company activism is rising assist from giant index funds which, by means of the cash they handle for 1000’s of particular person buyers, are often the biggest shareholders in U.S. corporations. Increasingly, these buyers have sought to wield that affect to nudge company boards to vary, mentioned Marc Goldstein, head of U.S. analysis at company governance advisory agency ISS.
Activists can solely achieve success at huge corporations “if they can convince mainstream institutional investors to support them,” Goldstein mentioned. “Those mainstream institutions are paying increasing attention to issues like climate and human capital management.”
Last yr, a tiny activist agency referred to as Engine No. 1 seized three seats on the board of Exxon partly by convincing main shareholders — together with Vanguard, BlackRock and State Street — that the fossil gas large had failed to arrange for the local weather disaster and its possible impression on the vitality enterprise.
Icahn has solely purchased a small variety of shares in each McDonald’s and Kroger, the place he has additionally criticized the stark hole between the pay of executives and rank-and-file workers.
That’s a serious distinction to his ways at giant corporations equivalent to TWA and Blockbuster, the place he acquired controlling stakes and compelled them into line on their price constructions and failure to pursue strategic tie-ups. In the interview with The Washington Post, Icahn, 86, mentioned he’s now working to steer the massive index funds that personal shares in McDonald’s and Kroger to assist him in his bid to interchange two members of every firm’s board with consultants on social points.
“What’s gone on in the last five years is inordinate power has gone to the index funds,” Icahn mentioned. “Hopefully if this power is used, it will force CEOs to become much more accountable, which will help our economy.”
McDonald’s mentioned in a information launch final week that Icahn’s demand for the corporate to supply pork solely from suppliers who home pigs with out utilizing crates is “completely unfeasible” as a result of there are far too few “crate-free” suppliers available in the market to assist demand.
Kroger spokeswoman Kristal Howard mentioned in an electronic mail the corporate is dedicated to working with its suppliers to assist animal welfare and is making vital investments to lift the hourly wage of its workers.
Shareholders in public corporations have lengthy wielded energy to drive change. In addition to proposing resolutions on hot-topic points on the annual shareholder assembly and placing them to a vote, activists generally construct an possession stake within the firm to extend their energy over which administrators get elected to the board, and in flip, their leverage over key points going through the corporate.
Musk was initially anticipated to take this path when he disclosed he had acquired the 9 % stake in Twitter earlier this month. Quickly, he confirmed his hand on the problems that mattered to him.
In a tweet in late March, Musk mentioned, “Given that Twitter serves as the de facto public town square, failing to adhere to free speech principles fundamentally undermines democracy.”
Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal mentioned Musk rejected a board seat, one thing that will have restricted him to a stake of lower than 15 %.
Musk spoke at a TED convention earlier this month after launching his hostile takeover bid, taking difficulty with everlasting bans for customers and calling for Twitter to make its algorithm public. One urgent query following the sale is whether or not he plans to reinstate former president Donald Trump, who was banned from the positioning following his position within the Jan. 6 rebel on the Capitol.
“My strong intuitive sense is that having a public platform that is maximally trusted and broadly inclusive is extremely important to the future of civilization,” he mentioned earlier this month. “I don’t care about the economics at all,” he added.
While his pitch to the general public largely revolved across the censorship points, Musk additionally appealed to shareholders on the grounds that his supply was their finest likelihood to money out. In a collection of tweets, he acknowledged his want that each one shareholders ought to get to vote on his supply, and teased the likelihood he may push for a young supply on to buyers — a conventional route for hostile takeover makes an attempt when a board rejects their advances.
Three days earlier than closing the acquisition, Elon Musk additionally held a collection of personal Zoom discussions with prime executives at huge funding corporations geared towards getting their assist for the takeover bid, based on one of many folks briefed on the conferences who spoke on the situation of anonymity to debate delicate issues.
Had Twitter rejected Musk, the billionaire might have discovered it tough to maneuver ahead together with his bid due to defensive measures the corporate had in place designed to cease takeover makes an attempt, governance consultants mentioned. The day after his preliminary supply, the board adopted a “poison pill,” a measure designed to make it tough to purchase a agency with out negotiating with the board.
Twitter’s board additionally has what’s often known as a “staggered” construction, which means shareholders vote for various teams of administrators every year. If Musk tried to wage a marketing campaign so as to add his personal administrators to the board, he would solely have been capable of change just a few board seats subsequent yr, and never the bulk essential to approve a buyout supply. The firm is at present proposing to take away this staggered construction within the coming years.
In some ways, the Musk deal is an anomaly. According to Dealogic, which tracks data on company mergers, there have solely been six hostile takeovers of U.S. corporations bigger than $44 billion since 1995. Over the identical interval, no particular person individual earlier than Musk has ever accomplished an unsolicited takeover of an organization price greater than $20 billion.
One lesson all companies can take from the deal is that no firm is just too huge to be purchased out, mentioned Charles Elson, the founding director of the University of Delaware’s Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance.
“Everyone at some point could be vulnerable if the right person comes around with the right amount of money,” Elson mentioned.